folio 376
SWALLOW when he left this land. Likewise the same Rainer the deacon was in
possession of Erik brother of Tosti's land which is in GRIMSBY hundred; now the
Bishop of Bayeux has it.
Ralph of Mortimer's men and Losoard of Rolleston's men receive a new toll in
GRIMSBY, which did not exist before 1066, but Losoard of Rolleston denies that
his men did it on his authority.
WALSHCROFT Wapentake
The Bishop of Bayeux and the Bishop of Lincoln ought to have jurisdiction over 2
1/2 bovates of land which lies in the lands of the church of Winghale.
In OWERSBY hundred the Bishop of Bayeux has jurisdiction over 1/2 carucate of
land which was Ernwin the priest's, and is now Siward the priest's.
In OSGODBY Jocelyn son of Lambert ought to have jurisdiction over 1/2 bovate of
land.
In TEALBY hundred Rainer the deacon had Erik brother of Tosti's land with all
that belongs there. Jocelyn son of Lambert holds it and Rainer claims it. The
Riding testifies that Count Alan's predecessor had the jurisdiction but they do
not know of what type.
In CLAXBY Jocelyn son of Lambert ought to have 1 mill which Geoffrey, Ivo
Tallboys man, seized against his will.
In CROXBY William Blunt ought to have 1 garden in Ivo Tallboys' land, but he is
prevented from doing so on account of a mill which was not there before 1066.
HAVERSTOE Wapentake
In FULSTOW the Bishop of Durham ought to have 40 acres of land - of meadow - and
4 plots, and Count Alan jurisdiction over them, as the Wapentake says.
In the same village FULSTOW they judge that Count Alan has jurisdiction over 1
carucate of land in Robert the bursar's land, and Drogo of la Beuvrière ought to
have 1 salt-house there which he claims, and Count Alan jurisdiction over it.
Rainer the deacon was in possession of Fulcric's land in CUXWOLD when he left
this land. Now Archbishop Thomas holds it; Rainer of Brimeux claims it.
Also in CUXWOLD William of Percy ought to have 2 bovates of land, which he
claims, in Hugh son of Baldric's land. The Wapentake testifies in favour of him.
The Wapentake says that Count Alan ought to have jurisdiction over Grimkel's
hall, whose land the Bishop of Durham has in [Wold] Newton.
Kolsveinn of Lincoln did not deliver the land of Ingimundr and his brothers to
Count Alan, but the same Ingimundr made it subject to this Count on account of
other land which he held from him.
LUDBOROUGH Wapentake
The North Riding, and all the County, testifies that the land of Ulf son of Topi
in [North] Ormsby, that is 4 1/2 carucates of land, was sold to St Mary's of
Stow before 1066 and it lay in its lands in 1066, and later on Bishop Remigius
was in possession of it.
In SCHEMIN [North] Ormsby in Ivo Tallboys land Drogo of la Beuvrière claims 3
messuages which he ought to have, by witness of the Wapentake, with full
jurisdiction.
In FOTHERBY, the land of Berengar of Tosny, the Bishop of Durham ought to have 5
bovates of land and Berengar of Tosny jurisdiction over it.
BOLINGBROKE Wapentake
The Wapentake, and the whole County, testifies that the Bishop of Durham ought
to have the land of 3 brothers with full jurisdiction, and Eudo son of Spirewic
the land of the fourth brother, likewise with full jurisdiction: their names are
Sighvatr - or Godwin - Alnoth, Fenkell and Eskil.
List 7
Claims in the West Riding
LAWRESS Wapentake
Lawress Wapentake testifies that Alnoth had full jurisdiction over his land, 3
carucates in BURTON. Now Swartbrand son of Ulf has it after him.
The Abbot of Peterborough claims 4 bovates of land in RISEHOLME, Kolsveinn of
Lincoln's land, and the Wapentake testifies that before 1066 they lay in the
lands of the church of All Saints in Lincoln.
Three burgesses of Lincoln, Guthroth the lawman, Leofwin and Sigewine, before
1066 held in pledge from Aghmund son of Walraven the land which Jocelyn son of
Lambert claims in [Middle] CARLTON against Norman the fat.
In SCAMPTON Norman the fat added £3 and 1 gold mark, and he pledged this to Ivo
the sheriff.
In SCOTHERN hundred before 1066 Godric, Norman of Arcy's predecessor, had 4 1/2
bovates of land, as the Wapentake testifies.
In the same hundred SCOTHERN Gilbert of Ghent claims 1 carucate of land against
the Abbot of Peterborough. But the Wapentake testifies that St Peter's had this
land with its jurisdiction in 1066.
In NETTLEHAM hundred Bishop Remigius claims 2 bovates of land and the Wapentake
testifies he ought to have them himself.
The Wapentake says that St Peter's of Peterborough ought to have the fourth part
of the woodland which Ranulf and Kolsveinn of Lincoln claim in REEPHAM.
WELL Wapentake
The Wapentake testifies that Ulfkil, Asfrith, Restelf and Wulfmer had full
jurisdiction over their lands and over their men in STURTON-by-Stow hundred. St
Mary's of Stow has 2 parts of the jurisdiction over the forfeiture in the
Wapentake, and the Earl the third. Now the King has it. Likewise concerning
heriot. If they had forfeited their land, St Mary's would have had 2 parts and
the Earl the third.
The Shire testifies that Gunnhvati's land - 1 manor of 1 carucate in lordship -
was forfeited, 2 parts going to St Mary's of Stow and the third part for the
Earl's use. Likewise concerning all the jurisdiction which belongs to [Gate]
Burton or Broctone. Likewise also concerning Steingrimr's land, 18 bovates of
land.
Concerning all the thanes who have land in Well Wapentake, St Mary's has 2 parts
of the forfeiture, the Earl the third; likewise concerning heriot. Likewise if
they had forfeited their land, two parts would have been in St Mary's of Stow
and the third part in the Earl's hands. Now the King has it. In this custom
Gilbert of Ghent does not partake nor Robert of Tosny nor Ralph of Mortimer
because of their predecessors.
ASLACOE Wapentake
Before 1066 Grimkel had full jurisdiction over his land, but in 1066 he
forfeited it and gave it to Merleswein the sheriff, because he stood accused
before the King, and made him heir to it.
In OWMBY-by-Spital Jocelyn son of Lambert has 9 bovates of Aghmund son of
Walraven's land and Ivo Tallboys 1 bovate. Bishop Remigius ought to have the
jurisdiction of these.
|